Rail

Restoring track geometry at rail transition zones

Problem

Differential settlement and stiffness mismatch at the UBC4 rail transition zone caused recurring twist faults, geometry distortion, and costly maintenance interventions on the busy Dublin–Cork main line.

Solution

Geobear stabilised the transition zone using patented geopolymer injection technology, restoring uniform stiffness, eliminating twist faults, and achieving lasting track geometry correction without excavation or line closures.

59–69%

Reduction in twist faults after treatment

95%

Lower carbon emissions compared to traditional reconstruction

0 daytime disruption

All works completed in 19 overnight shifts

Background

Railway foundations are critical to maintaining track geometry, safety, and ride comfort. A recurring problem arises at transition zones—locations where the track moves from one structural support type to another, such as embankments to bridges. These areas are prone to differential settlement, voiding, and stiffness mismatches, which result in:

  • Twist faults and rail distortion, particularly near abutments
  • Excessive and repeated maintenance interventions
  • Progressive deterioration of rail fastenings and substructure

At the UBC4 Sarsfield Road bridge on the Dublin–Cork main line, Iarnród Éireann faced such challenges. The single-span structure, skewed to the track, exhibited perennial twist defects and settlement at abutments. Routine tamping and maintenance only provided temporary relief, with geometry faults returning soon after.

UBC4 rail transition diagram

Pictured: UBC4 Sarsfield Road bridge (side view)

Solution

Geobear proposed a non-disruptive solution using expansive geopolymer  resins. These multi-component structural resins are injected in liquid form into the soil, where they expand, fill voids, and increase density and stiffness.

Key advantages:

  • Rapid curing (tack-free within 60–90 seconds)
  • 120-year design life, chemically inert and non-biodegradable
  • Delivered entirely in nighttime possessions, eliminating the need for line closures
  • Carbon reduction of 75–95% compared to reconstruction
  • Non-intrusive installation with precision monitoring of track lift and geometry

Importantly, the design approach used was underpinned by Geobear’s patent GB2614319A, which describes resin injection strategies and modelling techniques for optimised ground strengthening.

 

Transition zone requiring treatment

Typical transition zone treatment using Geopolymer Injections (after patent GB2614319A)

 

Precision geopolymer injection restored track stability and eliminated twist faults — all achieved overnight, without excavation or disruption to Ireland’s busiest rail line.

Technical design approach

The design methodology for UBC4 followed a structured geotechnical process:

1. Ground model development: Based on borehole logs and track data, layers of ballast, sub-ballast, clay fills, and stiff clay were defined with associated stiffness (Eu = 12–40 MPa) and shear strengths.

2. Transition zone length: Determined by line speed (60 mph → 13.8 m) using the half-speed rule.

3. Numerical modelling: PLAXIS finite element simulations assessed track deformation under dynamic train loading. Results confirmed that >90% of displacement occurred within 1.5 m of the subgrade surface, focusing treatment depth.

rail transition sleepers and tracks

(Figure 1) Detailed design for transition zone treatment (using geopolymer injections) on UB4

Rail transition plaxis analysis

(Figure 2) PLAXIS analysis for transition zone treatment (using geopolymer injections) on UB4

Geopolymer treatment installation

rail transition site

rail transition site teams

The installation of Geobear’s expansive geopolymer system at UBC4 was carried out within restricted nighttime possessions, ensuring that the line remained operational during the day. A total of 528 injection points were drilled across the transition zone, with different injection depths, with resin quantities increased towards the bridge abutments to account for higher stiffness requirements.

The geopolymer was delivered in liquid form and expanded in situ, filling voids, densifying the clay fills, and reinforcing the sub-ballast layer. The expansion process was closely monitored using laser levelling (±0.5 mm accuracy) to prevent over-lift of the track during injection. 

By executing the works in 19 consecutive nighttime shifts, Geobear eliminated the need for disruptive excavation or reconstruction. The process was completed with no health or safety incidents, and the treated transition zone was immediately available for train traffic at line speed the following day.

 

Verification and post-injection performance

Performance was verified through both geotechnical and track monitoring methods:

Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) Testing: DCP testing confirmed that soil stiffness targets of 50–80 MPa were consistently achieved throughout the transition zone. Notably, values increased to approximately 100 MPa near the abutments, indicating effective soil densification.

UBC 4 before after diagram

Track Geometry Monitoring: Track geometry was monitored before and after treatment using laser leveling and geospatial surveying. The results demonstrated a 59–69% reduction in twist faults, with 75% of locations showing a downgrade from red faults to yellow or green. These improvements were achieved without the need for tamping between monitoring events.

UBC 4 track geometry

These results demonstrate that the expanding resin solution provided a consistent transition stiffness profile, improved track geometry, and reduced the need for ongoing maintenance.

Advances of the Geobear System

The UBC4 case demonstrates the strategic benefits of Geobear’s system:

  • Engineering Validation: Supported by advanced finite element modelling, comprehensive field trials, and a patent-protected design methodology.
  • Operational Efficiency: The entire project was completed in just 19 nighttime shifts, eliminating the weeks of disruption typically required for reconstruction.
  • Sustainability: Achieved lifecycle CO₂ reductions of up to 95% compared to conventional methods.
  • Safety and Durability: Utilized an inert resin with a lifespan exceeding 100 years, installed with zero reported incidents.
  • Scalability: Suitable for application across bridges, level crossings, embankments, and slab track transitions throughout global rail networks.

Conclusion

Geobear’s patented geopolymer injection technology provides a proven, non-disruptive alternative to conventional transition zone reconstruction. At UBC4, Dublin, the solution achieved the client’s performance targets, reduced faults, extended asset life, and delivered substantial carbon and cost savings.

This case study underlines the viability of expanding resins as the future of railway foundation stabilisation—a solution that keeps railways running while protecting both budgets and the environment.

Ready to discuss your project?

Get in touch with our expert team today and discover how Geobear can extend the life of your critical infrastructure assets.

Bear pointing Bear pointing